What Would Happen if Measure 1 Passed in North Dakota?
North Dakota voters have amended their constitution via a simple majority vote for more than 100 years. If Measure 1 passes on November 3, 2026, future constitutional amendments in North Dakota would need at least 60% of the vote to take effect, allowing just more than 40% of voters to block any amendment. In other words, Measure 1 would change the current system of simple majority rule to minority rule. Read more about minority rule here.
North Dakota’s System of Majority Rule for Ballot Measures Would Change.
Minority rule describes any situation in which the smaller side of a vote decides the outcome. Under a 60% approval threshold, a bloc holding just over 40% of the vote can defeat an amendment that nearly 60% of voters support. Supporters of Measure 1 see that as a deliberate safeguard for constitutional stability. Opponents see it as a departure from majority rule, the principle that the side with more votes wins.
Measure 1 Would Make North Dakota an Outlier.
A 60% threshold would put North Dakota in a small group. As of 2025, only Florida and Illinois required a 60% supermajority to approve constitutional amendments. Since Florida adopted its rule in 2006, 13 amendments there have won a majority but failed to reach 60% (Ballotpedia News).
Colorado requires 55%. New Hampshire has the highest bar, at two-thirds (Ballotpedia). New Hampshire also requires a three-fifths vote in each legislative chamber just to place an amendment on the ballot (State Court Report, Brennan Center for Justice).
North Dakota isn't the only state considering the change this year. South Dakota voters will decide a similar 60% requirement on the same November ballot.
What Past Constitutional Amendments Would Not Have Passed Under Measure 1?
Since 1996, at least eight North Dakota constitutional amendments won a majority but fell short of 60%:
- 2024 Legacy Fund Transfers Amendment: about 52% (North Dakota Monitor)
- 2018 Ethics Commission Amendment: about 54% (Grand Forks Herald / North Dakota Monitor)
- 2014 Initiated Measure Petition Submission Deadline Amendment: 43,868 to 38,051, about 54% (2015 North Dakota Session Laws)
- 2002 Taxable Status of Conservation Land Amendment: 113,345 to 106,770, about 51% (2003 North Dakota Session Laws)
- 2002 Election of County Officers Amendment: 62,215 to 51,174, about 55% (2003 North Dakota Session Laws)
- 2000 State Board of Higher Education Amendment: 46,226 to 33,385, about 58% (2001 North Dakota Session Laws)
- 2000 Legislative Assembly Vacancy Filling Amendment: 41,058 to 38,648, about 52% (2001 North Dakota Session Laws)
- 1996 House Member Terms Amendment: 132,718 to 112,047, about 54% (vote totals compiled in 2021 testimony to the Senate Government and Veterans Affairs Committee, citing the 1997 Session Laws)
Under Measure 1, all of these amendments would have failed.
Bottom Line
Measure 1 requires a higher vote threshold for future constitutional amendments. Its practical effect, judging by recent North Dakota elections, would be broader than that sounds. At least eight amendments that passed with clear majorities since 1996 would not have passed under Measure 1.